La mente en la naturaleza. El problema de la finalidad de lo inconsciente
In this paper I study the problem of unconscious ends, firstly, comparing three alternative physicalist views expressed in the systems of Nicolai Hartmann, Daniel Dennett and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. Via this comparison, I show how the phenomenological perspective of the first author brings o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Language: | spa |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22394 |
| _version_ | 1793399985336745984 |
|---|---|
| author | Echarte-Alonso, L.E. (Luis Enrique) |
| author_facet | Echarte-Alonso, L.E. (Luis Enrique) |
| author_sort | Echarte-Alonso, L.E. (Luis Enrique) |
| collection | DSpace |
| description | In this paper I study the problem of unconscious ends, firstly,
comparing three alternative physicalist views expressed in the
systems of Nicolai Hartmann, Daniel Dennett and Pierre Teilhard
de Chardin. Via this comparison, I show how the phenomenological
perspective of the first author brings out the deficits of
Dennett’s eliminativism and Teilhard’s panpsychism. Secondly,
however, I criticize Hartmann’s thesis that ends are inaccessible
events to objective knowledge, using certain arguments from
Elizabeth Anscombe and Anthony Kenny. |
| format | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| id | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171-22394 |
| institution | Universidad de Navarra |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171-223942021-02-01T15:05:58Z La mente en la naturaleza. El problema de la finalidad de lo inconsciente Echarte-Alonso, L.E. (Luis Enrique) Alma Inconsciente Teleología Fin In this paper I study the problem of unconscious ends, firstly, comparing three alternative physicalist views expressed in the systems of Nicolai Hartmann, Daniel Dennett and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. Via this comparison, I show how the phenomenological perspective of the first author brings out the deficits of Dennett’s eliminativism and Teilhard’s panpsychism. Secondly, however, I criticize Hartmann’s thesis that ends are inaccessible events to objective knowledge, using certain arguments from Elizabeth Anscombe and Anthony Kenny. 2012-06-01T10:33:12Z 2012-06-01T10:33:12Z 2008 info:eu-repo/semantics/article https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22394 spa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf |
| spellingShingle | Alma Inconsciente Teleología Fin Echarte-Alonso, L.E. (Luis Enrique) La mente en la naturaleza. El problema de la finalidad de lo inconsciente |
| title | La mente en la naturaleza. El problema de la finalidad de lo inconsciente |
| title_full | La mente en la naturaleza. El problema de la finalidad de lo inconsciente |
| title_fullStr | La mente en la naturaleza. El problema de la finalidad de lo inconsciente |
| title_full_unstemmed | La mente en la naturaleza. El problema de la finalidad de lo inconsciente |
| title_short | La mente en la naturaleza. El problema de la finalidad de lo inconsciente |
| title_sort | la mente en la naturaleza. el problema de la finalidad de lo inconsciente |
| topic | Alma Inconsciente Teleología Fin |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22394 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT echartealonsoleluisenrique lamenteenlanaturalezaelproblemadelafinalidaddeloinconsciente |