Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses

Objective To analyze the usefulness of transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. Material and Methods Ninety-one consecutive patients (mean age: 46.6 years, range: 16–81 years) diagnosed as having an adnexal mass were evaluated by tran...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alcazar, J.L. (Juan Luis), Lopez-Garcia, G. (Guillermo)
Format: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Language:eng
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22721
_version_ 1793399924199522304
author Alcazar, J.L. (Juan Luis)
Lopez-Garcia, G. (Guillermo)
author_facet Alcazar, J.L. (Juan Luis)
Lopez-Garcia, G. (Guillermo)
author_sort Alcazar, J.L. (Juan Luis)
collection DSpace
description Objective To analyze the usefulness of transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. Material and Methods Ninety-one consecutive patients (mean age: 46.6 years, range: 16–81 years) diagnosed as having an adnexal mass were evaluated by transvaginal color Doppler sonography prior to surgery. Color Doppler was used to detect and analyze the flow velocity waveform from arterial and venous blood flow within the tumor. For arterial signals the resistance index and peak systolic velocity, and for veins the maximum venous flow velocity, were calculated. Receiver operator characteristic curves were plotted to determine the best venous flow velocity cut-off. According to our previous study using arterial Doppler, a tumor was considered as malignant when flow was detected and the lowest resistance index was ≤ 0.45. Using venous Doppler a mass was considered as malignant when flow was detected and the venous flow velocity was ≥ the best cut-off found on the receiver operator characteristic curve. Definitive histopathological diagnosis was obtained in all cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for B-mode morphology (evaluation performed according to Sassone’s scoring system), arterial Doppler, venous Doppler, and a combination of both arterial and venous Doppler were calculated. Results Twenty-five masses (27.5%) were malignant and 66 (72.5%) benign. Arterial and venous flow was found more frequently in malignant than in benign masses (92% vs. 41% (P < 0.001) and 72% vs. 21% (P < 0.001), respectively). The resistance index was significantly lower in malignant tumors (0.42 vs. 0.60, P = 0.0003). No differences were found in peak systolic velocity. Venous flow velocity was significantly higher in malignant masses (18.1 cm/s vs. 8.9 cm/s, P = 0.0006). The best cut-off of venous flow velocity was 10 cm/s. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for morphology, arterial Doppler, venous Doppler, and the combination of both arterial and venous Doppler were 92%, 71%, 45%, 96%; 76%, 95%, 87%, 91%; 68%, 94%, 81%, 89%; and 88%, 91%, 79%, 95%, respectively. Conclusions Our results indicate that preoperative evaluation by venous flow assessment of adnexal masses may be useful to discriminate between malignant and benign tumors.
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
id oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171-22721
institution Universidad de Navarra
language eng
publishDate 2012
publisher Wiley-Blackwell
record_format dspace
spelling oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171-227212022-06-29T09:28:04Z Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses Alcazar, J.L. (Juan Luis) Lopez-Garcia, G. (Guillermo) Adnexal mass Doppler ultrasound Arterial flow Objective To analyze the usefulness of transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. Material and Methods Ninety-one consecutive patients (mean age: 46.6 years, range: 16–81 years) diagnosed as having an adnexal mass were evaluated by transvaginal color Doppler sonography prior to surgery. Color Doppler was used to detect and analyze the flow velocity waveform from arterial and venous blood flow within the tumor. For arterial signals the resistance index and peak systolic velocity, and for veins the maximum venous flow velocity, were calculated. Receiver operator characteristic curves were plotted to determine the best venous flow velocity cut-off. According to our previous study using arterial Doppler, a tumor was considered as malignant when flow was detected and the lowest resistance index was ≤ 0.45. Using venous Doppler a mass was considered as malignant when flow was detected and the venous flow velocity was ≥ the best cut-off found on the receiver operator characteristic curve. Definitive histopathological diagnosis was obtained in all cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for B-mode morphology (evaluation performed according to Sassone’s scoring system), arterial Doppler, venous Doppler, and a combination of both arterial and venous Doppler were calculated. Results Twenty-five masses (27.5%) were malignant and 66 (72.5%) benign. Arterial and venous flow was found more frequently in malignant than in benign masses (92% vs. 41% (P < 0.001) and 72% vs. 21% (P < 0.001), respectively). The resistance index was significantly lower in malignant tumors (0.42 vs. 0.60, P = 0.0003). No differences were found in peak systolic velocity. Venous flow velocity was significantly higher in malignant masses (18.1 cm/s vs. 8.9 cm/s, P = 0.0006). The best cut-off of venous flow velocity was 10 cm/s. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for morphology, arterial Doppler, venous Doppler, and the combination of both arterial and venous Doppler were 92%, 71%, 45%, 96%; 76%, 95%, 87%, 91%; 68%, 94%, 81%, 89%; and 88%, 91%, 79%, 95%, respectively. Conclusions Our results indicate that preoperative evaluation by venous flow assessment of adnexal masses may be useful to discriminate between malignant and benign tumors. 2012-06-27T11:46:18Z 2012-06-27T11:46:18Z 2001 info:eu-repo/semantics/article https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22721 eng http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00394.x/pdf info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf Wiley-Blackwell
spellingShingle Adnexal mass
Doppler ultrasound
Arterial flow
Alcazar, J.L. (Juan Luis)
Lopez-Garcia, G. (Guillermo)
Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses
title Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses
title_full Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses
title_fullStr Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses
title_full_unstemmed Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses
title_short Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses
title_sort transvaginal color doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses
topic Adnexal mass
Doppler ultrasound
Arterial flow
url https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22721
work_keys_str_mv AT alcazarjljuanluis transvaginalcolordopplerassessmentofvenousflowinadnexalmasses
AT lopezgarciagguillermo transvaginalcolordopplerassessmentofvenousflowinadnexalmasses