Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are highly prevalent in nosocomial and community settings, and their diagnosis is costly and time-consuming. Screening methods represent an important advance towards the final UTI diagnosis, diminishing inappropriate treatment or clinical complications. Automated ana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iñigo, M. (Melania), Coello, A. (Andreu), Fernández-Rivas, G. (Gema), Carrasco, M. (María), Marcó, C. (Clara), Fernández, A. (Anabel), Casamajor, T. (Teresa), Ausina, V. (Vicente)
Format: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Language:eng
Published: Elsevier 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10171/68856
_version_ 1793400026451410944
author Iñigo, M. (Melania)
Coello, A. (Andreu)
Fernández-Rivas, G. (Gema)
Carrasco, M. (María)
Marcó, C. (Clara)
Fernández, A. (Anabel)
Casamajor, T. (Teresa)
Ausina, V. (Vicente)
author_facet Iñigo, M. (Melania)
Coello, A. (Andreu)
Fernández-Rivas, G. (Gema)
Carrasco, M. (María)
Marcó, C. (Clara)
Fernández, A. (Anabel)
Casamajor, T. (Teresa)
Ausina, V. (Vicente)
author_sort Iñigo, M. (Melania)
collection DSpace
description Urinary tract infections (UTI) are highly prevalent in nosocomial and community settings, and their diagnosis is costly and time-consuming. Screening methods represent an important advance towards the final UTI diagnosis, diminishing inappropriate treatment or clinical complications. Automated analyzers have been developed and commercialized to screen and rule out negative urine samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate two of these automated analyzers (SediMax, an automatic sediment analyzer and UF-1000i a flow cytometer) to predict negative urine cultures. A total of 1934 urine samples were analyzed. A very strong correlation for white blood cells (WBC) (rs: 0.928) and a strong correlation for bacteria (BAC) (rs: 0.693) were obtained. We also calculated optimal cut-off points for both autoanalyzers: 18 WBC/μL and 97 BAC/μL for SediMax (sensitivity = 96.25%, specificity = 63.04%, negative predictive value = 97.97%), and 40 WBC/μL and 460 BAC/μL for UF-1000i (sensitivity = 98.13%, specificity = 79.16%, negative predictive value = 99.18%). The use of SediMax and UF- 1000i resulted in a 46.33% and 57.19% reduction of all samples cultured, respectively. In conclusion, both ana- lyzers are good UTI screening tools in our setting.
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
id oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171-68856
institution Universidad de Navarra
language eng
publishDate 2024
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171-688562024-02-12T06:07:40Z Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections Iñigo, M. (Melania) Coello, A. (Andreu) Fernández-Rivas, G. (Gema) Carrasco, M. (María) Marcó, C. (Clara) Fernández, A. (Anabel) Casamajor, T. (Teresa) Ausina, V. (Vicente) Materias Investigacion::Ciencias de la Salud Urinary tract infection Urinalysis Autoanalyzers Flow cytometry Automated urine sediment Urinary tract infections (UTI) are highly prevalent in nosocomial and community settings, and their diagnosis is costly and time-consuming. Screening methods represent an important advance towards the final UTI diagnosis, diminishing inappropriate treatment or clinical complications. Automated analyzers have been developed and commercialized to screen and rule out negative urine samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate two of these automated analyzers (SediMax, an automatic sediment analyzer and UF-1000i a flow cytometer) to predict negative urine cultures. A total of 1934 urine samples were analyzed. A very strong correlation for white blood cells (WBC) (rs: 0.928) and a strong correlation for bacteria (BAC) (rs: 0.693) were obtained. We also calculated optimal cut-off points for both autoanalyzers: 18 WBC/μL and 97 BAC/μL for SediMax (sensitivity = 96.25%, specificity = 63.04%, negative predictive value = 97.97%), and 40 WBC/μL and 460 BAC/μL for UF-1000i (sensitivity = 98.13%, specificity = 79.16%, negative predictive value = 99.18%). The use of SediMax and UF- 1000i resulted in a 46.33% and 57.19% reduction of all samples cultured, respectively. In conclusion, both ana- lyzers are good UTI screening tools in our setting. 2024-02-07T07:53:44Z 2024-02-07T07:53:44Z 2016 info:eu-repo/semantics/article https://hdl.handle.net/10171/68856 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess application/pdf Elsevier
spellingShingle Materias Investigacion::Ciencias de la Salud
Urinary tract infection
Urinalysis Autoanalyzers
Flow cytometry
Automated urine sediment
Iñigo, M. (Melania)
Coello, A. (Andreu)
Fernández-Rivas, G. (Gema)
Carrasco, M. (María)
Marcó, C. (Clara)
Fernández, A. (Anabel)
Casamajor, T. (Teresa)
Ausina, V. (Vicente)
Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections
title Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections
title_full Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections
title_fullStr Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections
title_short Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections
title_sort evaluation of the sedimax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the sysmex uf-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections
topic Materias Investigacion::Ciencias de la Salud
Urinary tract infection
Urinalysis Autoanalyzers
Flow cytometry
Automated urine sediment
url https://hdl.handle.net/10171/68856
work_keys_str_mv AT inigommelania evaluationofthesedimaxautomatedmicroscopysedimentanalyzerandthesysmexuf1000iflowcytometerasscreeningtoolstoruleoutnegativeurinarytractinfections
AT coelloaandreu evaluationofthesedimaxautomatedmicroscopysedimentanalyzerandthesysmexuf1000iflowcytometerasscreeningtoolstoruleoutnegativeurinarytractinfections
AT fernandezrivasggema evaluationofthesedimaxautomatedmicroscopysedimentanalyzerandthesysmexuf1000iflowcytometerasscreeningtoolstoruleoutnegativeurinarytractinfections
AT carrascommaria evaluationofthesedimaxautomatedmicroscopysedimentanalyzerandthesysmexuf1000iflowcytometerasscreeningtoolstoruleoutnegativeurinarytractinfections
AT marcocclara evaluationofthesedimaxautomatedmicroscopysedimentanalyzerandthesysmexuf1000iflowcytometerasscreeningtoolstoruleoutnegativeurinarytractinfections
AT fernandezaanabel evaluationofthesedimaxautomatedmicroscopysedimentanalyzerandthesysmexuf1000iflowcytometerasscreeningtoolstoruleoutnegativeurinarytractinfections
AT casamajortteresa evaluationofthesedimaxautomatedmicroscopysedimentanalyzerandthesysmexuf1000iflowcytometerasscreeningtoolstoruleoutnegativeurinarytractinfections
AT ausinavvicente evaluationofthesedimaxautomatedmicroscopysedimentanalyzerandthesysmexuf1000iflowcytometerasscreeningtoolstoruleoutnegativeurinarytractinfections