Building Tree Allometry Relationships Based on TLS Point Clouds and Machine Learning Regression

Most of the allometric models used to estimate tree aboveground biomass rely on tree diameter at breast height (DBH). However, it is difficult to measure DBH from airborne remote sensors, and is common to draw upon traditional least squares linear regression models to relate DBH with dendrometric va...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aguilar Torres, Fernando José, Nemmaoui, Abderrahim, Aguilar Torres, Manuel Ángel, Peñalver, Alberto
Format: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10835/12779
_version_ 1789406313540747264
author Aguilar Torres, Fernando José
Nemmaoui, Abderrahim
Aguilar Torres, Manuel Ángel
Peñalver, Alberto
author_facet Aguilar Torres, Fernando José
Nemmaoui, Abderrahim
Aguilar Torres, Manuel Ángel
Peñalver, Alberto
author_sort Aguilar Torres, Fernando José
collection DSpace
description Most of the allometric models used to estimate tree aboveground biomass rely on tree diameter at breast height (DBH). However, it is difficult to measure DBH from airborne remote sensors, and is common to draw upon traditional least squares linear regression models to relate DBH with dendrometric variables measured from airborne sensors, such as tree height (H) and crown diameter (CD). This study explores the usefulness of ensemble-type supervised machine learning regression algorithms, such as random forest regression (RFR), categorical boosting (CatBoost), gradient boosting (GBoost), or AdaBoost regression (AdaBoost), as an alternative to linear regression (LR) for modelling the allometric relationships DBH = Φ(H) and DBH = Ψ(H, CD). The original dataset was made up of 2272 teak trees (Tectona grandis Linn. F.) belonging to three different plantations located in Ecuador. All teak trees were digitally reconstructed from terrestrial laser scanning point clouds. The results showed that allometric models involving both H and CD to estimate DBH performed better than those based solely on H. Furthermore, boosting machine learning regression algorithms (CatBoost and GBoost) outperformed RFR (bagging) and LR (traditional linear regression) models, both in terms of goodness-of-fit (R2) and stability (variations in training and testing samples).
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
id oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-12779
institution Universidad de Cuenca
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-127792023-10-10T11:07:36Z Building Tree Allometry Relationships Based on TLS Point Clouds and Machine Learning Regression Aguilar Torres, Fernando José Nemmaoui, Abderrahim Aguilar Torres, Manuel Ángel Peñalver, Alberto terrestrial laser scanning allometricmodels machine learning regression teak plantations forest inventory Most of the allometric models used to estimate tree aboveground biomass rely on tree diameter at breast height (DBH). However, it is difficult to measure DBH from airborne remote sensors, and is common to draw upon traditional least squares linear regression models to relate DBH with dendrometric variables measured from airborne sensors, such as tree height (H) and crown diameter (CD). This study explores the usefulness of ensemble-type supervised machine learning regression algorithms, such as random forest regression (RFR), categorical boosting (CatBoost), gradient boosting (GBoost), or AdaBoost regression (AdaBoost), as an alternative to linear regression (LR) for modelling the allometric relationships DBH = Φ(H) and DBH = Ψ(H, CD). The original dataset was made up of 2272 teak trees (Tectona grandis Linn. F.) belonging to three different plantations located in Ecuador. All teak trees were digitally reconstructed from terrestrial laser scanning point clouds. The results showed that allometric models involving both H and CD to estimate DBH performed better than those based solely on H. Furthermore, boosting machine learning regression algorithms (CatBoost and GBoost) outperformed RFR (bagging) and LR (traditional linear regression) models, both in terms of goodness-of-fit (R2) and stability (variations in training and testing samples). 2021-11-15T11:29:54Z 2021-11-15T11:29:54Z 2021-10-29 info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2076-3417 http://hdl.handle.net/10835/12779 10.3390/app112110139 en Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess MDPI
spellingShingle terrestrial laser scanning
allometricmodels
machine learning regression
teak plantations
forest inventory
Aguilar Torres, Fernando José
Nemmaoui, Abderrahim
Aguilar Torres, Manuel Ángel
Peñalver, Alberto
Building Tree Allometry Relationships Based on TLS Point Clouds and Machine Learning Regression
title Building Tree Allometry Relationships Based on TLS Point Clouds and Machine Learning Regression
title_full Building Tree Allometry Relationships Based on TLS Point Clouds and Machine Learning Regression
title_fullStr Building Tree Allometry Relationships Based on TLS Point Clouds and Machine Learning Regression
title_full_unstemmed Building Tree Allometry Relationships Based on TLS Point Clouds and Machine Learning Regression
title_short Building Tree Allometry Relationships Based on TLS Point Clouds and Machine Learning Regression
title_sort building tree allometry relationships based on tls point clouds and machine learning regression
topic terrestrial laser scanning
allometricmodels
machine learning regression
teak plantations
forest inventory
url http://hdl.handle.net/10835/12779
work_keys_str_mv AT aguilartorresfernandojose buildingtreeallometryrelationshipsbasedontlspointcloudsandmachinelearningregression
AT nemmaouiabderrahim buildingtreeallometryrelationshipsbasedontlspointcloudsandmachinelearningregression
AT aguilartorresmanuelangel buildingtreeallometryrelationshipsbasedontlspointcloudsandmachinelearningregression
AT penalveralberto buildingtreeallometryrelationshipsbasedontlspointcloudsandmachinelearningregression