Photogrammetry (SfM) vs Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for archaeological excavations: mosaic of Cantillana (Spain) as a case study
The discovery of a Roman mosaic from the 2nd century AD in Cantillana (Seville) generated interest and the need for exhaustive documentation, so that it could be recreated with real measurements in a 3D model, not only to obtain an exact replica, but with the intention of analyzing and studying the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10835/13121 |
_version_ | 1789406507234754560 |
---|---|
author | Marín-Buzón, Carmen Pérez Romero, Antonio Miguel León-Bonillo, Manuel J. Martínez-Álvarez, Rubén Mejías-García, Juan Carlos Manzano Agugliaro, Francisco |
author_facet | Marín-Buzón, Carmen Pérez Romero, Antonio Miguel León-Bonillo, Manuel J. Martínez-Álvarez, Rubén Mejías-García, Juan Carlos Manzano Agugliaro, Francisco |
author_sort | Marín-Buzón, Carmen |
collection | DSpace |
description | The discovery of a Roman mosaic from the 2nd century AD in Cantillana (Seville) generated interest and the need for exhaustive documentation, so that it could be recreated with real measurements in a 3D model, not only to obtain an exact replica, but with the intention of analyzing and studying the behavior of two main geomatics techniques. Thus, the objective of this study was the comparative analysis of both techniques: near object photogrammetry by SfM and terrestrial laser scanner or TLS. The aim of this comparison was to assess the use of both techniques in archaeological excavations. Special attention was paid to the accuracy and precision of measurements and models, especially in altimetry. Mosaics are frequently relocated from their original location to be exhibited in museums or for restoration work, after which they are returned to their original place. Therefore, the altimetric situation is of special relevance. To analyze the accuracy and errors of each technique, a total station was used to establish the real values of the ground control points (GCP) on which the comparisons of both methods were to be made. It can be concluded that the SfM technique was the most accurate and least limiting for use in semi-buried archaeological excavations. This manuscript opens new perspectives for the use of SfM-based photogrammetry in archaeological excavations. |
format | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
id | oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-13121 |
institution | Universidad de Cuenca |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-131212023-04-12T19:31:12Z Photogrammetry (SfM) vs Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for archaeological excavations: mosaic of Cantillana (Spain) as a case study Marín-Buzón, Carmen Pérez Romero, Antonio Miguel León-Bonillo, Manuel J. Martínez-Álvarez, Rubén Mejías-García, Juan Carlos Manzano Agugliaro, Francisco archaeology photogrammetry SfM scanner TLS mosaic marble The discovery of a Roman mosaic from the 2nd century AD in Cantillana (Seville) generated interest and the need for exhaustive documentation, so that it could be recreated with real measurements in a 3D model, not only to obtain an exact replica, but with the intention of analyzing and studying the behavior of two main geomatics techniques. Thus, the objective of this study was the comparative analysis of both techniques: near object photogrammetry by SfM and terrestrial laser scanner or TLS. The aim of this comparison was to assess the use of both techniques in archaeological excavations. Special attention was paid to the accuracy and precision of measurements and models, especially in altimetry. Mosaics are frequently relocated from their original location to be exhibited in museums or for restoration work, after which they are returned to their original place. Therefore, the altimetric situation is of special relevance. To analyze the accuracy and errors of each technique, a total station was used to establish the real values of the ground control points (GCP) on which the comparisons of both methods were to be made. It can be concluded that the SfM technique was the most accurate and least limiting for use in semi-buried archaeological excavations. This manuscript opens new perspectives for the use of SfM-based photogrammetry in archaeological excavations. 2021-12-22T13:44:41Z 2021-12-22T13:44:41Z 2021-12-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2076-3417 http://hdl.handle.net/10835/13121 en https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/24/11994 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess MDPI |
spellingShingle | archaeology photogrammetry SfM scanner TLS mosaic marble Marín-Buzón, Carmen Pérez Romero, Antonio Miguel León-Bonillo, Manuel J. Martínez-Álvarez, Rubén Mejías-García, Juan Carlos Manzano Agugliaro, Francisco Photogrammetry (SfM) vs Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for archaeological excavations: mosaic of Cantillana (Spain) as a case study |
title | Photogrammetry (SfM) vs Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for archaeological excavations: mosaic of Cantillana (Spain) as a case study |
title_full | Photogrammetry (SfM) vs Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for archaeological excavations: mosaic of Cantillana (Spain) as a case study |
title_fullStr | Photogrammetry (SfM) vs Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for archaeological excavations: mosaic of Cantillana (Spain) as a case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Photogrammetry (SfM) vs Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for archaeological excavations: mosaic of Cantillana (Spain) as a case study |
title_short | Photogrammetry (SfM) vs Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for archaeological excavations: mosaic of Cantillana (Spain) as a case study |
title_sort | photogrammetry (sfm) vs terrestrial laser scanning (tls) for archaeological excavations: mosaic of cantillana (spain) as a case study |
topic | archaeology photogrammetry SfM scanner TLS mosaic marble |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/10835/13121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinbuzoncarmen photogrammetrysfmvsterrestriallaserscanningtlsforarchaeologicalexcavationsmosaicofcantillanaspainasacasestudy AT perezromeroantoniomiguel photogrammetrysfmvsterrestriallaserscanningtlsforarchaeologicalexcavationsmosaicofcantillanaspainasacasestudy AT leonbonillomanuelj photogrammetrysfmvsterrestriallaserscanningtlsforarchaeologicalexcavationsmosaicofcantillanaspainasacasestudy AT martinezalvarezruben photogrammetrysfmvsterrestriallaserscanningtlsforarchaeologicalexcavationsmosaicofcantillanaspainasacasestudy AT mejiasgarciajuancarlos photogrammetrysfmvsterrestriallaserscanningtlsforarchaeologicalexcavationsmosaicofcantillanaspainasacasestudy AT manzanoagugliarofrancisco photogrammetrysfmvsterrestriallaserscanningtlsforarchaeologicalexcavationsmosaicofcantillanaspainasacasestudy |