Comparison of Iris-Claw Phakic Lens Implant versus Corneal Laser Techniques in High Myopia: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study

Background. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Femto-LASIK, PRK, and Artiflex/Artisan phakic lens implantation in the surgical correction of myopia at different moments of postoperative follow-up; to propose a linear predictive model of visual acuity without correction at five ye...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Castro De Luna, Gracia María, Sánchez-Liñán, Noelia, Alaskar Alani, Hazem, Pérez-Rueda, Antonio, Nievas Soriano, Bruno José
Format: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10835/14013
_version_ 1789408410431651840
author Castro De Luna, Gracia María
Sánchez-Liñán, Noelia
Alaskar Alani, Hazem
Pérez-Rueda, Antonio
Nievas Soriano, Bruno José
author_facet Castro De Luna, Gracia María
Sánchez-Liñán, Noelia
Alaskar Alani, Hazem
Pérez-Rueda, Antonio
Nievas Soriano, Bruno José
author_sort Castro De Luna, Gracia María
collection DSpace
description Background. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Femto-LASIK, PRK, and Artiflex/Artisan phakic lens implantation in the surgical correction of myopia at different moments of postoperative follow-up; to propose a linear predictive model of visual acuity without correction at five years of refractive procedures; and to evaluate its validity. Methods. A retrospective observational analysis was performed. Patients were clinically reviewed after three months, one year, two years, and five years. Univariate and bivariate analyses and a multivariate linear regression model were performed. Results. Six hundred seventy-nine eyes were analyzed: 18.9% Artiflex, 2.8% Artisan, 42.3% Femto-LASIK, and 36.1% PRK. There were significant differences in effectiveness and safety after five years when comparing Artiflex/Artisan versus PRK and Femto-LASIK (p < 0.01). The linear regression model explained 30.32% of the patients’ visual acuity variability after five years. Conclusions. PRK surgery, Femto-Lasik, and Artiflex/Artisan type phakic lens implantation are effective, safe, and predictable techniques with stable refractive results. Phakic lenses magnify myopic patients who improve their UCVA and BCVA. Concerning phakic lens implantation, corneal endothelial cells remain stable. The predictive model calculated that surgery with a phakic lens increased the UCVA result at five years, and surgery with PRK slightly decreased the long-term results.
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
id oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-14013
institution Universidad de Cuenca
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-140132023-10-25T12:22:17Z Comparison of Iris-Claw Phakic Lens Implant versus Corneal Laser Techniques in High Myopia: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study Castro De Luna, Gracia María Sánchez-Liñán, Noelia Alaskar Alani, Hazem Pérez-Rueda, Antonio Nievas Soriano, Bruno José iris-claw phakic lens implant corneal laser high myopia Femto-LASIK PRK Artiflex Artisan Background. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Femto-LASIK, PRK, and Artiflex/Artisan phakic lens implantation in the surgical correction of myopia at different moments of postoperative follow-up; to propose a linear predictive model of visual acuity without correction at five years of refractive procedures; and to evaluate its validity. Methods. A retrospective observational analysis was performed. Patients were clinically reviewed after three months, one year, two years, and five years. Univariate and bivariate analyses and a multivariate linear regression model were performed. Results. Six hundred seventy-nine eyes were analyzed: 18.9% Artiflex, 2.8% Artisan, 42.3% Femto-LASIK, and 36.1% PRK. There were significant differences in effectiveness and safety after five years when comparing Artiflex/Artisan versus PRK and Femto-LASIK (p < 0.01). The linear regression model explained 30.32% of the patients’ visual acuity variability after five years. Conclusions. PRK surgery, Femto-Lasik, and Artiflex/Artisan type phakic lens implantation are effective, safe, and predictable techniques with stable refractive results. Phakic lenses magnify myopic patients who improve their UCVA and BCVA. Concerning phakic lens implantation, corneal endothelial cells remain stable. The predictive model calculated that surgery with a phakic lens increased the UCVA result at five years, and surgery with PRK slightly decreased the long-term results. 2022-10-05T17:48:03Z 2022-10-05T17:48:03Z 2022-09-28 info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2227-9032 http://hdl.handle.net/10835/14013 10.3390/healthcare10101904 en https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/10/1904 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess MDPI
spellingShingle iris-claw
phakic lens implant
corneal laser
high myopia
Femto-LASIK
PRK
Artiflex
Artisan
Castro De Luna, Gracia María
Sánchez-Liñán, Noelia
Alaskar Alani, Hazem
Pérez-Rueda, Antonio
Nievas Soriano, Bruno José
Comparison of Iris-Claw Phakic Lens Implant versus Corneal Laser Techniques in High Myopia: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study
title Comparison of Iris-Claw Phakic Lens Implant versus Corneal Laser Techniques in High Myopia: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full Comparison of Iris-Claw Phakic Lens Implant versus Corneal Laser Techniques in High Myopia: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Iris-Claw Phakic Lens Implant versus Corneal Laser Techniques in High Myopia: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Iris-Claw Phakic Lens Implant versus Corneal Laser Techniques in High Myopia: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study
title_short Comparison of Iris-Claw Phakic Lens Implant versus Corneal Laser Techniques in High Myopia: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study
title_sort comparison of iris-claw phakic lens implant versus corneal laser techniques in high myopia: a five-year follow-up study
topic iris-claw
phakic lens implant
corneal laser
high myopia
Femto-LASIK
PRK
Artiflex
Artisan
url http://hdl.handle.net/10835/14013
work_keys_str_mv AT castrodelunagraciamaria comparisonofirisclawphakiclensimplantversuscorneallasertechniquesinhighmyopiaafiveyearfollowupstudy
AT sanchezlinannoelia comparisonofirisclawphakiclensimplantversuscorneallasertechniquesinhighmyopiaafiveyearfollowupstudy
AT alaskaralanihazem comparisonofirisclawphakiclensimplantversuscorneallasertechniquesinhighmyopiaafiveyearfollowupstudy
AT perezruedaantonio comparisonofirisclawphakiclensimplantversuscorneallasertechniquesinhighmyopiaafiveyearfollowupstudy
AT nievassorianobrunojose comparisonofirisclawphakiclensimplantversuscorneallasertechniquesinhighmyopiaafiveyearfollowupstudy