Validity evidence for the internal structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: a comparison between classical CFA model and the ESEM and the bifactor models

Academic burnout is a psychological problem characterized by three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. This paper studies the internal structure of the MBI-SS, the most widely used instrument to assess burnout in students. The bifactor model and the ESEM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aguayo-Estremera, Raimundo, Cañadas, Gustavo R., Ortega Campos, Elena María, Ariza, Tania, Fuente-Solana, Emilia Inmaculada De la
Format: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1515
http://hdl.handle.net/10835/14451
_version_ 1789406403003154432
author Aguayo-Estremera, Raimundo
Cañadas, Gustavo R.
Ortega Campos, Elena María
Ariza, Tania
Fuente-Solana, Emilia Inmaculada De la
author_facet Aguayo-Estremera, Raimundo
Cañadas, Gustavo R.
Ortega Campos, Elena María
Ariza, Tania
Fuente-Solana, Emilia Inmaculada De la
author_sort Aguayo-Estremera, Raimundo
collection DSpace
description Academic burnout is a psychological problem characterized by three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. This paper studies the internal structure of the MBI-SS, the most widely used instrument to assess burnout in students. The bifactor model and the ESEM approach have been proposed as alternatives, capable of overcoming the classical techniques of CFA to address this issue. Our study considers the internal structure of the MBI-SS by testing the models most frequently referenced in the literature, along with the bifactor model and the ESEM. After determining which model best fits the data, we calculate the most appropriate reliability index. In addition, we examined the validity evidence using other variables, namely the concurrent relationships with depression, anxiety, neuroticism, and conscientiousness, and the discriminant relationships with the dimensions of engagement, extraversion, and agreeableness. The results obtained indicate that the internal structure of the MBI-SS is well reflected by the three-factor congeneric oblique model, reaching good values of reliability and convergent and discriminant validity. Therefore, when the scale is used in applied contexts, we recommend considering the total scores obtained for each of the dimensions. Finally, we recommend using the omega coefficient and not the alpha coefficient as an estimator of reliability.
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
id oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-14451
institution Universidad de Cuenca
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-144512023-04-12T19:42:15Z Validity evidence for the internal structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: a comparison between classical CFA model and the ESEM and the bifactor models Aguayo-Estremera, Raimundo Cañadas, Gustavo R. Ortega Campos, Elena María Ariza, Tania Fuente-Solana, Emilia Inmaculada De la academic burnout syndrome MBI-SS internal structure reliability and validity ESSEM and bifactor model Academic burnout is a psychological problem characterized by three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. This paper studies the internal structure of the MBI-SS, the most widely used instrument to assess burnout in students. The bifactor model and the ESEM approach have been proposed as alternatives, capable of overcoming the classical techniques of CFA to address this issue. Our study considers the internal structure of the MBI-SS by testing the models most frequently referenced in the literature, along with the bifactor model and the ESEM. After determining which model best fits the data, we calculate the most appropriate reliability index. In addition, we examined the validity evidence using other variables, namely the concurrent relationships with depression, anxiety, neuroticism, and conscientiousness, and the discriminant relationships with the dimensions of engagement, extraversion, and agreeableness. The results obtained indicate that the internal structure of the MBI-SS is well reflected by the three-factor congeneric oblique model, reaching good values of reliability and convergent and discriminant validity. Therefore, when the scale is used in applied contexts, we recommend considering the total scores obtained for each of the dimensions. Finally, we recommend using the omega coefficient and not the alpha coefficient as an estimator of reliability. 2023-03-27T08:00:06Z 2023-03-27T08:00:06Z 2023-03-21 info:eu-repo/semantics/article https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1515 2227-7390 http://hdl.handle.net/10835/14451 10.3390/math11061515 en Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess MDPI
spellingShingle academic burnout syndrome
MBI-SS
internal structure
reliability and validity
ESSEM and bifactor model
Aguayo-Estremera, Raimundo
Cañadas, Gustavo R.
Ortega Campos, Elena María
Ariza, Tania
Fuente-Solana, Emilia Inmaculada De la
Validity evidence for the internal structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: a comparison between classical CFA model and the ESEM and the bifactor models
title Validity evidence for the internal structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: a comparison between classical CFA model and the ESEM and the bifactor models
title_full Validity evidence for the internal structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: a comparison between classical CFA model and the ESEM and the bifactor models
title_fullStr Validity evidence for the internal structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: a comparison between classical CFA model and the ESEM and the bifactor models
title_full_unstemmed Validity evidence for the internal structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: a comparison between classical CFA model and the ESEM and the bifactor models
title_short Validity evidence for the internal structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: a comparison between classical CFA model and the ESEM and the bifactor models
title_sort validity evidence for the internal structure of the maslach burnout inventory-student survey: a comparison between classical cfa model and the esem and the bifactor models
topic academic burnout syndrome
MBI-SS
internal structure
reliability and validity
ESSEM and bifactor model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1515
http://hdl.handle.net/10835/14451
work_keys_str_mv AT aguayoestremeraraimundo validityevidencefortheinternalstructureofthemaslachburnoutinventorystudentsurveyacomparisonbetweenclassicalcfamodelandtheesemandthebifactormodels
AT canadasgustavor validityevidencefortheinternalstructureofthemaslachburnoutinventorystudentsurveyacomparisonbetweenclassicalcfamodelandtheesemandthebifactormodels
AT ortegacamposelenamaria validityevidencefortheinternalstructureofthemaslachburnoutinventorystudentsurveyacomparisonbetweenclassicalcfamodelandtheesemandthebifactormodels
AT arizatania validityevidencefortheinternalstructureofthemaslachburnoutinventorystudentsurveyacomparisonbetweenclassicalcfamodelandtheesemandthebifactormodels
AT fuentesolanaemiliainmaculadadela validityevidencefortheinternalstructureofthemaslachburnoutinventorystudentsurveyacomparisonbetweenclassicalcfamodelandtheesemandthebifactormodels