Children’s Performance Estimation in Mathematics and Science Tests over a School Year: A Pilot Study
Abstract Introduction. The metacognitve ability to accurately estimate ones performance in a test, is assumed to be of central importance for initializing task-oriented effort. In addition activating adequate problem-solving strategies, and engaging in efficient error detection and correction. Altho...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad de Almería
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10835/2549 http://dx.doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v11i29.1555 |
| Summary: | Abstract Introduction. The metacognitve ability to accurately estimate ones performance in a test, is assumed to be of central importance for initializing task-oriented effort. In addition activating adequate problem-solving strategies, and engaging in efficient error detection and correction. Although school children’s’ ability to estimate their own performance has been widely inves-tigated, this was mostly done under highly-controlled, experimental set-ups including only one single test occasion. Method. The aim of this study was to investigate this metacognitive ability in the context of real achievement tests in mathematics. Developed and applied by a teacher of a 5th grade class over the course of a school year these tests allowed the exploration of the variability of performance estimation accuracy as a function of test difficulty. Results. Mean performance estimations were generally close to actual performance with somewhat less variability compared to test performance. When grouping the children into three achievement levels, results revealed higher accuracy of performance estimations in the high achievers compared to the low and average achievers. In order to explore the generaliza-tion of these findings, analyses were also conducted for the same children’s tests in their sci-ence classes revealing a very similar pattern of results compared to the domain of mathemat-ics. Discussion and Conclusion. By and large, the present study, in a natural environment, con-firmed previous laboratory findings but also offered additional insights into the generalisation and the test dependency of students’ performances estimations. Keywords: metacognition, primary school, performance estimation, mathematics, science |
|---|