Wind Tunnel Analysis of the Airflow through Insect-Proof Screens and Comparison of Their Effect When Installed in a Mediterranean Greenhouse

The present work studies the effect of three insect-proof screens with different geometrical and aerodynamic characteristics on the air velocity and temperature inside a Mediterranean multi-span greenhouse with three roof vents and without crops, divided into two independent sectors. First, the inse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: López Martínez, Alejandro, Molina Aiz, Francisco Domingo, Valera Martínez, Diego Luis, Peña Fernández, Ana Araceli
Format: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10835/7334
_version_ 1789406348020023296
author López Martínez, Alejandro
Molina Aiz, Francisco Domingo
Valera Martínez, Diego Luis
Peña Fernández, Ana Araceli
author_facet López Martínez, Alejandro
Molina Aiz, Francisco Domingo
Valera Martínez, Diego Luis
Peña Fernández, Ana Araceli
author_sort López Martínez, Alejandro
collection DSpace
description The present work studies the effect of three insect-proof screens with different geometrical and aerodynamic characteristics on the air velocity and temperature inside a Mediterranean multi-span greenhouse with three roof vents and without crops, divided into two independent sectors. First, the insect-proof screens were characterised geometrically by analysing digital images and testing in a low velocity wind tunnel. The wind tunnel tests gave screen discharge coefficient values of Cd,φ of 0.207 for screen 1 (10 × 20 threads·cm−2; porosity φ = 35.0%), 0.151 for screen 2 (13 × 30 threads·cm−2; φ = 26.3%) and 0.325 for screen 3 (10 × 20 threads·cm−2; porosity φ = 36.0%), at an air velocity of 0.25 m·s−1. Secondly, when screens were installed in the greenhouse, we observed a statistical proportionality between the discharge coefficient at the openings and the air velocity ui measured in the centre of the greenhouse, ui = 0.856 Cd + 0.062 (R2 = 0.68 and p-value = 0.012). The inside-outside temperature difference ΔTio diminishes when the inside velocity increases following the statistically significant relationship ΔTio = (−135.85 + 57.88/ui)0.5 (R2 = 0.85 and p-value = 0.0011). Different thread diameters and tension affects the screen thickness, and means that similar porosities may well be associated with very different aerodynamic characteristics. Screens must be characterised by a theoretical function Cd,φ = [(2eμ/Kpρ)·(1/us) + (2eY/Kp0.5)]−0.5 that relates the discharge coefficient of the screen Cd,φ with the air velocity us. This relationship depends on the three parameters that define the aerodynamic behaviour of porous medium: permeability Kp, inertial factor Y and screen thickness e (and on air temperature that determine its density ρ and viscosity μ). However, for a determined temperature of air, the pressure drop-velocity relationship can be characterised only with two parameters: ΔP = aus2 + bus.
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
id oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-7334
institution Universidad de Cuenca
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-73342023-04-12T19:28:53Z Wind Tunnel Analysis of the Airflow through Insect-Proof Screens and Comparison of Their Effect When Installed in a Mediterranean Greenhouse López Martínez, Alejandro Molina Aiz, Francisco Domingo Valera Martínez, Diego Luis Peña Fernández, Ana Araceli insect-proof screen aerodynamic wind tunnel greenhouse microclimate The present work studies the effect of three insect-proof screens with different geometrical and aerodynamic characteristics on the air velocity and temperature inside a Mediterranean multi-span greenhouse with three roof vents and without crops, divided into two independent sectors. First, the insect-proof screens were characterised geometrically by analysing digital images and testing in a low velocity wind tunnel. The wind tunnel tests gave screen discharge coefficient values of Cd,φ of 0.207 for screen 1 (10 × 20 threads·cm−2; porosity φ = 35.0%), 0.151 for screen 2 (13 × 30 threads·cm−2; φ = 26.3%) and 0.325 for screen 3 (10 × 20 threads·cm−2; porosity φ = 36.0%), at an air velocity of 0.25 m·s−1. Secondly, when screens were installed in the greenhouse, we observed a statistical proportionality between the discharge coefficient at the openings and the air velocity ui measured in the centre of the greenhouse, ui = 0.856 Cd + 0.062 (R2 = 0.68 and p-value = 0.012). The inside-outside temperature difference ΔTio diminishes when the inside velocity increases following the statistically significant relationship ΔTio = (−135.85 + 57.88/ui)0.5 (R2 = 0.85 and p-value = 0.0011). Different thread diameters and tension affects the screen thickness, and means that similar porosities may well be associated with very different aerodynamic characteristics. Screens must be characterised by a theoretical function Cd,φ = [(2eμ/Kpρ)·(1/us) + (2eY/Kp0.5)]−0.5 that relates the discharge coefficient of the screen Cd,φ with the air velocity us. This relationship depends on the three parameters that define the aerodynamic behaviour of porous medium: permeability Kp, inertial factor Y and screen thickness e (and on air temperature that determine its density ρ and viscosity μ). However, for a determined temperature of air, the pressure drop-velocity relationship can be characterised only with two parameters: ΔP = aus2 + bus. 2020-01-16T08:45:19Z 2020-01-16T08:45:19Z 2016-05-12 info:eu-repo/semantics/article 1424-8220 http://hdl.handle.net/10835/7334 en https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/16/5/690 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess MDPI
spellingShingle insect-proof screen
aerodynamic
wind tunnel
greenhouse
microclimate
López Martínez, Alejandro
Molina Aiz, Francisco Domingo
Valera Martínez, Diego Luis
Peña Fernández, Ana Araceli
Wind Tunnel Analysis of the Airflow through Insect-Proof Screens and Comparison of Their Effect When Installed in a Mediterranean Greenhouse
title Wind Tunnel Analysis of the Airflow through Insect-Proof Screens and Comparison of Their Effect When Installed in a Mediterranean Greenhouse
title_full Wind Tunnel Analysis of the Airflow through Insect-Proof Screens and Comparison of Their Effect When Installed in a Mediterranean Greenhouse
title_fullStr Wind Tunnel Analysis of the Airflow through Insect-Proof Screens and Comparison of Their Effect When Installed in a Mediterranean Greenhouse
title_full_unstemmed Wind Tunnel Analysis of the Airflow through Insect-Proof Screens and Comparison of Their Effect When Installed in a Mediterranean Greenhouse
title_short Wind Tunnel Analysis of the Airflow through Insect-Proof Screens and Comparison of Their Effect When Installed in a Mediterranean Greenhouse
title_sort wind tunnel analysis of the airflow through insect-proof screens and comparison of their effect when installed in a mediterranean greenhouse
topic insect-proof screen
aerodynamic
wind tunnel
greenhouse
microclimate
url http://hdl.handle.net/10835/7334
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezmartinezalejandro windtunnelanalysisoftheairflowthroughinsectproofscreensandcomparisonoftheireffectwheninstalledinamediterraneangreenhouse
AT molinaaizfranciscodomingo windtunnelanalysisoftheairflowthroughinsectproofscreensandcomparisonoftheireffectwheninstalledinamediterraneangreenhouse
AT valeramartinezdiegoluis windtunnelanalysisoftheairflowthroughinsectproofscreensandcomparisonoftheireffectwheninstalledinamediterraneangreenhouse
AT penafernandezanaaraceli windtunnelanalysisoftheairflowthroughinsectproofscreensandcomparisonoftheireffectwheninstalledinamediterraneangreenhouse