Revisiting a Water Conflict in Southeastern Oklahoma 6 Years Later: A New Valuation of the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services

In recent years, researchers have begun to adopt a perspective evaluating “winners and losers” regarding the consumption and value of ecosystem services. “Winners” tend to benefit from the ecosystem service and “losers” absorb most associated costs. Our study focuses on water use in Oklahoma (USA) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burch, Claire, Busch, Michelle, Higgins, Edward, Bittner, Steven, Perera, Nuwanthika, Neal, Kevin, Burkett, Lawrence, Castro Martínez, Antonio, Anderson, Christopher
Format: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10835/7698
_version_ 1789406689956462592
author Burch, Claire
Busch, Michelle
Higgins, Edward
Bittner, Steven
Perera, Nuwanthika
Neal, Kevin
Burkett, Lawrence
Castro Martínez, Antonio
Anderson, Christopher
author_facet Burch, Claire
Busch, Michelle
Higgins, Edward
Bittner, Steven
Perera, Nuwanthika
Neal, Kevin
Burkett, Lawrence
Castro Martínez, Antonio
Anderson, Christopher
author_sort Burch, Claire
collection DSpace
description In recent years, researchers have begun to adopt a perspective evaluating “winners and losers” regarding the consumption and value of ecosystem services. “Winners” tend to benefit from the ecosystem service and “losers” absorb most associated costs. Our study focuses on water use in Oklahoma (USA) and a plan to divert water from the Kiamichi River in southeastern Oklahoma for consumption at residences in the Oklahoma City metropolitan area. Our study is, in part, a follow-up from an initial 2013 survey of Oklahoma City residents and residents of the Kiamichi. For this paper, a survey was distributed within the state of Oklahoma to evaluate changes to ecosystem service willingness to pay and valuation. This survey also included an experimental element assessing if exposure to additional information about ecosystem services influenced respondents on ecosystem service valuation, or willingness to pay. Our results generally aligned with those found in the 2013 survey. Oklahoma City residents are not aware of where their water is coming from and are not willing to pay to protect ecosystem services, despite an overall increase in activism. Our results indicate that a smaller number of significant factors determining willingness to pay for ecosystem service maintenance were identified than the study in 2013. Exposure to additional information had no effect on peoples’ preferences. We found that public opinion surrounding environmental support is context-specific, political conservatism may not always impede valuation of environmental protections. We conclude that cultural, moral, and political values interact in their influence on expressions of valuation and willingness to pay for ecosystem services.
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
id oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-7698
institution Universidad de Cuenca
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-76982023-04-12T19:00:27Z Revisiting a Water Conflict in Southeastern Oklahoma 6 Years Later: A New Valuation of the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services Burch, Claire Busch, Michelle Higgins, Edward Bittner, Steven Perera, Nuwanthika Neal, Kevin Burkett, Lawrence Castro Martínez, Antonio Anderson, Christopher winners and losers ecosystem services water conflict water resource management values In recent years, researchers have begun to adopt a perspective evaluating “winners and losers” regarding the consumption and value of ecosystem services. “Winners” tend to benefit from the ecosystem service and “losers” absorb most associated costs. Our study focuses on water use in Oklahoma (USA) and a plan to divert water from the Kiamichi River in southeastern Oklahoma for consumption at residences in the Oklahoma City metropolitan area. Our study is, in part, a follow-up from an initial 2013 survey of Oklahoma City residents and residents of the Kiamichi. For this paper, a survey was distributed within the state of Oklahoma to evaluate changes to ecosystem service willingness to pay and valuation. This survey also included an experimental element assessing if exposure to additional information about ecosystem services influenced respondents on ecosystem service valuation, or willingness to pay. Our results generally aligned with those found in the 2013 survey. Oklahoma City residents are not aware of where their water is coming from and are not willing to pay to protect ecosystem services, despite an overall increase in activism. Our results indicate that a smaller number of significant factors determining willingness to pay for ecosystem service maintenance were identified than the study in 2013. Exposure to additional information had no effect on peoples’ preferences. We found that public opinion surrounding environmental support is context-specific, political conservatism may not always impede valuation of environmental protections. We conclude that cultural, moral, and political values interact in their influence on expressions of valuation and willingness to pay for ecosystem services. 2020-02-19T08:29:03Z 2020-02-19T08:29:03Z 2020-01-22 info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2071-1050 http://hdl.handle.net/10835/7698 en https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/819 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess MDPI
spellingShingle winners and losers
ecosystem services
water conflict
water resource management
values
Burch, Claire
Busch, Michelle
Higgins, Edward
Bittner, Steven
Perera, Nuwanthika
Neal, Kevin
Burkett, Lawrence
Castro Martínez, Antonio
Anderson, Christopher
Revisiting a Water Conflict in Southeastern Oklahoma 6 Years Later: A New Valuation of the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services
title Revisiting a Water Conflict in Southeastern Oklahoma 6 Years Later: A New Valuation of the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services
title_full Revisiting a Water Conflict in Southeastern Oklahoma 6 Years Later: A New Valuation of the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services
title_fullStr Revisiting a Water Conflict in Southeastern Oklahoma 6 Years Later: A New Valuation of the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting a Water Conflict in Southeastern Oklahoma 6 Years Later: A New Valuation of the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services
title_short Revisiting a Water Conflict in Southeastern Oklahoma 6 Years Later: A New Valuation of the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services
title_sort revisiting a water conflict in southeastern oklahoma 6 years later: a new valuation of the willingness to pay for ecosystem services
topic winners and losers
ecosystem services
water conflict
water resource management
values
url http://hdl.handle.net/10835/7698
work_keys_str_mv AT burchclaire revisitingawaterconflictinsoutheasternoklahoma6yearslateranewvaluationofthewillingnesstopayforecosystemservices
AT buschmichelle revisitingawaterconflictinsoutheasternoklahoma6yearslateranewvaluationofthewillingnesstopayforecosystemservices
AT higginsedward revisitingawaterconflictinsoutheasternoklahoma6yearslateranewvaluationofthewillingnesstopayforecosystemservices
AT bittnersteven revisitingawaterconflictinsoutheasternoklahoma6yearslateranewvaluationofthewillingnesstopayforecosystemservices
AT pereranuwanthika revisitingawaterconflictinsoutheasternoklahoma6yearslateranewvaluationofthewillingnesstopayforecosystemservices
AT nealkevin revisitingawaterconflictinsoutheasternoklahoma6yearslateranewvaluationofthewillingnesstopayforecosystemservices
AT burkettlawrence revisitingawaterconflictinsoutheasternoklahoma6yearslateranewvaluationofthewillingnesstopayforecosystemservices
AT castromartinezantonio revisitingawaterconflictinsoutheasternoklahoma6yearslateranewvaluationofthewillingnesstopayforecosystemservices
AT andersonchristopher revisitingawaterconflictinsoutheasternoklahoma6yearslateranewvaluationofthewillingnesstopayforecosystemservices