Behavior of Different Grafting Strategies Using Automated Technology for Splice Grafting Technique
Even though the splicing graft technique is relatively recent, it has become the most commonly used grafting method for solanaceae, and in particular, for tomato. Today, almost everyone has standardized the use of plastic or silicone grafting clips, equipped with manipulating wings and a frontal ope...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10835/8121 |
| _version_ | 1789406627421487104 |
|---|---|
| author | Pardo Alonso, José Luis Carreño Ortega, Angel Martínez Gaitán, Carolina Clara Fatnassi, Hicham |
| author_facet | Pardo Alonso, José Luis Carreño Ortega, Angel Martínez Gaitán, Carolina Clara Fatnassi, Hicham |
| author_sort | Pardo Alonso, José Luis |
| collection | DSpace |
| description | Even though the splicing graft technique is relatively recent, it has become the most commonly used grafting method for solanaceae, and in particular, for tomato. Today, almost everyone has standardized the use of plastic or silicone grafting clips, equipped with manipulating wings and a frontal opening, to ensure proper bonding and allow for wound healing. Numerous factors influence the success or failure of the grafting process, factors such as the seedling varieties combined, climatic conditions, pre-graft and post-graft care, cutting point, cutting angle, pressure of the clips, blade edge, or substrate water content, among others. In this work, several alternatives in the graft assembly and coupling protocol were evaluated. Having studied the different working alternatives for grafting using a robotic system, two modes of joining order were analyzed. It has been shown that there are 20% more recorded successes if one first joins the graft seedlings and then places the grafting clip to guarantee their union. In addition, we studied the different orientation alternatives for the cutting line and the seedling union with respect to the clip opening—there were approximately 10% more successes obtained in grafts where the splice-union cutting line between the two plants faced the clip opening. |
| format | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| id | oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-8121 |
| institution | Universidad de Cuenca |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | MDPI |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-81212023-11-08T08:19:58Z Behavior of Different Grafting Strategies Using Automated Technology for Splice Grafting Technique Pardo Alonso, José Luis Carreño Ortega, Angel Martínez Gaitán, Carolina Clara Fatnassi, Hicham tomato grafting splice-grafting technique agricultural robot automated grafting agricultural machinery grafting clips tube grafting slant-cut grafting Japanese top grafting Even though the splicing graft technique is relatively recent, it has become the most commonly used grafting method for solanaceae, and in particular, for tomato. Today, almost everyone has standardized the use of plastic or silicone grafting clips, equipped with manipulating wings and a frontal opening, to ensure proper bonding and allow for wound healing. Numerous factors influence the success or failure of the grafting process, factors such as the seedling varieties combined, climatic conditions, pre-graft and post-graft care, cutting point, cutting angle, pressure of the clips, blade edge, or substrate water content, among others. In this work, several alternatives in the graft assembly and coupling protocol were evaluated. Having studied the different working alternatives for grafting using a robotic system, two modes of joining order were analyzed. It has been shown that there are 20% more recorded successes if one first joins the graft seedlings and then places the grafting clip to guarantee their union. In addition, we studied the different orientation alternatives for the cutting line and the seedling union with respect to the clip opening—there were approximately 10% more successes obtained in grafts where the splice-union cutting line between the two plants faced the clip opening. 2020-04-28T09:50:22Z 2020-04-28T09:50:22Z 2020-04-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2076-3417 http://hdl.handle.net/10835/8121 en https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/8/2745 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess MDPI |
| spellingShingle | tomato grafting splice-grafting technique agricultural robot automated grafting agricultural machinery grafting clips tube grafting slant-cut grafting Japanese top grafting Pardo Alonso, José Luis Carreño Ortega, Angel Martínez Gaitán, Carolina Clara Fatnassi, Hicham Behavior of Different Grafting Strategies Using Automated Technology for Splice Grafting Technique |
| title | Behavior of Different Grafting Strategies Using Automated Technology for Splice Grafting Technique |
| title_full | Behavior of Different Grafting Strategies Using Automated Technology for Splice Grafting Technique |
| title_fullStr | Behavior of Different Grafting Strategies Using Automated Technology for Splice Grafting Technique |
| title_full_unstemmed | Behavior of Different Grafting Strategies Using Automated Technology for Splice Grafting Technique |
| title_short | Behavior of Different Grafting Strategies Using Automated Technology for Splice Grafting Technique |
| title_sort | behavior of different grafting strategies using automated technology for splice grafting technique |
| topic | tomato grafting splice-grafting technique agricultural robot automated grafting agricultural machinery grafting clips tube grafting slant-cut grafting Japanese top grafting |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/10835/8121 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pardoalonsojoseluis behaviorofdifferentgraftingstrategiesusingautomatedtechnologyforsplicegraftingtechnique AT carrenoortegaangel behaviorofdifferentgraftingstrategiesusingautomatedtechnologyforsplicegraftingtechnique AT martinezgaitancarolinaclara behaviorofdifferentgraftingstrategiesusingautomatedtechnologyforsplicegraftingtechnique AT fatnassihicham behaviorofdifferentgraftingstrategiesusingautomatedtechnologyforsplicegraftingtechnique |