Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

According to the World Health Organization, cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world. In Spain, about a quarter of a million cases were diagnosed in 2017, and 81% of the Spanish population has used, at least once, some kind of complementary therapy. Said therapies are increasingly be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guerra-Martín, María Dolores, Tejedor-Bueno, María Sandra, Correa-Casado, Matías
Format: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10835/9524
_version_ 1789408421425971200
author Guerra-Martín, María Dolores
Tejedor-Bueno, María Sandra
Correa-Casado, Matías
author_facet Guerra-Martín, María Dolores
Tejedor-Bueno, María Sandra
Correa-Casado, Matías
author_sort Guerra-Martín, María Dolores
collection DSpace
description According to the World Health Organization, cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world. In Spain, about a quarter of a million cases were diagnosed in 2017, and 81% of the Spanish population has used, at least once, some kind of complementary therapy. Said therapies are increasingly being used by cancer patients. The purpose of the study is to analyse the effectiveness of complementary therapies among cancer patients. A systematic peer review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guide in four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and WOS). The inclusion criteria were Randomised Clinical Trials, published between 2013 and 2018, with a value of 3 or more on the Jadad Scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019127593). The study sample amounted to 1845 patients (64.55% women), the most common being breast cancer patients (794), followed by lung cancer patients (341). Fifteen complementary therapies were identified. We found two studies for each of the following: electroacupuncture, phytotherapy, hypnotherapy, guided imagery and progressive muscle relaxation. From the remaining ones, we identified a study on each therapy. The findings reveal some effective complementary therapies: auriculotherapy and acupuncture, laser moxibustion, hypnosis, Ayurveda, electroacupuncture, progressive muscle relaxation and guided imagery, yoga, phytotherapy, music therapy and traditional Chinese medicine. On the other hand, electroacupuncture, laser moxibustion and traditional Chinese medicine presented adverse effects, and kinesiology did not show effectiveness
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
id oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-9524
institution Universidad de Cuenca
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling oai:repositorio.ual.es:10835-95242023-04-12T19:19:33Z Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review Guerra-Martín, María Dolores Tejedor-Bueno, María Sandra Correa-Casado, Matías complementary therapies effectiveness neoplasms Randomised Controlled Trial systematic review treatment outcome According to the World Health Organization, cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world. In Spain, about a quarter of a million cases were diagnosed in 2017, and 81% of the Spanish population has used, at least once, some kind of complementary therapy. Said therapies are increasingly being used by cancer patients. The purpose of the study is to analyse the effectiveness of complementary therapies among cancer patients. A systematic peer review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guide in four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and WOS). The inclusion criteria were Randomised Clinical Trials, published between 2013 and 2018, with a value of 3 or more on the Jadad Scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019127593). The study sample amounted to 1845 patients (64.55% women), the most common being breast cancer patients (794), followed by lung cancer patients (341). Fifteen complementary therapies were identified. We found two studies for each of the following: electroacupuncture, phytotherapy, hypnotherapy, guided imagery and progressive muscle relaxation. From the remaining ones, we identified a study on each therapy. The findings reveal some effective complementary therapies: auriculotherapy and acupuncture, laser moxibustion, hypnosis, Ayurveda, electroacupuncture, progressive muscle relaxation and guided imagery, yoga, phytotherapy, music therapy and traditional Chinese medicine. On the other hand, electroacupuncture, laser moxibustion and traditional Chinese medicine presented adverse effects, and kinesiology did not show effectiveness 2021-02-01T09:13:11Z 2021-02-01T09:13:11Z 2021-01-24 info:eu-repo/semantics/article 1660-4601 http://hdl.handle.net/10835/9524 en https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1017 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess MDPI
spellingShingle complementary therapies
effectiveness
neoplasms
Randomised Controlled Trial
systematic review
treatment outcome
Guerra-Martín, María Dolores
Tejedor-Bueno, María Sandra
Correa-Casado, Matías
Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
title Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
title_full Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
title_short Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
title_sort effectiveness of complementary therapies in cancer patients: a systematic review
topic complementary therapies
effectiveness
neoplasms
Randomised Controlled Trial
systematic review
treatment outcome
url http://hdl.handle.net/10835/9524
work_keys_str_mv AT guerramartinmariadolores effectivenessofcomplementarytherapiesincancerpatientsasystematicreview
AT tejedorbuenomariasandra effectivenessofcomplementarytherapiesincancerpatientsasystematicreview
AT correacasadomatias effectivenessofcomplementarytherapiesincancerpatientsasystematicreview